This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Connell, R. W. Articles by Messerschmidt, J. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Hegemonic Masculinity

Rethinking the Concept

University of Sydney, Australia

James W. Messerschmidt

University of Southern Maine

The concept of hegemonic masculinity has influenced gender studies across many academic fields but has also attracted serious criticism. The authors trace the origin of the concept in a convergence of ideas in the early 1980s and map the ways it was applied when research on men and masculinities expanded. Evaluating the principal criticisms, the authors defend the underlying concept of masculinity, which in most research use is neither reified nor essentialist. However, the criticism of trait models of gender and rigid typologies is sound. The treatment of the subject in research on hegemonic masculinity can be improved with the aid of recent psychological models, although limits to discursive flexibility must be recognized. The concept of hegemonic masculinity does not equate to a model of social reproduction; we need to recognize social struggles in which subordinated masculinities influence dominant forms. Finally, the authors review what has been confirmed from early formulations (the idea of multiple masculinities, the concept of hegemony, and the emphasis on change) and what needs to be discarded (onedimensional treatment of hierarchy and trait conceptions of gender). The authors suggest reformulation of the concept in four areas: a more complex model of gender hierarchy, emphasizing the agency of women; explicit recognition of the geography of masculinities, emphasizing the interplay among local, regional, and global levels; a more specific treatment of embodiment in contexts of privilege and power; and a stronger emphasis on the dynamics of hegemonic masculinity, recognizing internal contradictions and the possibilities of movement toward gender democracy.

Key Words: masculinity • hegemony • gender • social power • agency • embodiment • globalization

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. H. Andersen Speaking About the Unspeakable: Sexually Abused Men Striving Toward Language American Journal of Men's Health, March 1, 2008; 2(1): 25 - 36. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A.-D. Christensen and J. E. Larsen Gender, Class, and Family: Men and Gender Equality in a Danish Context Soc. Pol., March 1, 2008; 15(1): 53 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Schrock and I. Padavic Negotiating Hegemonic Masculinity in a Batterer Intervention Program Gender Society, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 625 - 649. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. M. Robinson and S. E. Spivey The Politics of Masculinity and the Ex-Gay Movement Gender Society, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 650 - 675. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Messner The Masculinity of the Governator: Muscle and Compassion in American Politics Gender Society, August 1, 2007; 21(4): 461 - 480. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. W. Morris "Ladies" or "Loudies"?: Perceptions and Experiences of Black Girls in Classrooms Youth Society, June 1, 2007; 38(4): 490 - 515. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. F. Sharp Editorial Feminist Criminology, April 1, 2006; 1(2): 103 - 105. [PDF]