This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ridgeway, C. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Framed Before We Know It

How Gender Shapes Social Relations

Stanford University

In this article, I argue that gender is a primary cultural frame for coordinating behavior and organizing social relations. I describe the implications for understanding how gender shapes social behavior and organizational structures. By my analysis, gender typically acts as a background identity that biases, in gendered directions, the performance of behaviors undertaken in the name of organizational roles and identities. I develop an account of how the background effects of the gender frame on behavior vary by the context that different organizational and institutional structures set but can also infuse gendered meanings into organizational practices. Next, I apply this account to two empirical illustrations to demonstrate that we cannot understand the shape that the structure of gender inequality and gender difference takes in particular institutional or societal contexts without taking into account the background effects of the gender frame on behavior in these contexts.

Key Words: gender inequality • social interaction • culture • institutions • stereotypes

References

• Acker, Joan. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society 4:139-58.[Abstract]
• Bielby, William T. 2000. Minimizing workplace gender and racial bias. Contemporary Sociology 29:120-28.[CrossRef]
• Blair, Irene V., and Mahzarin R. Banaji. 1996. Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70:1142-63.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Brewer, Marilynn, and Layton Lui. 1989. The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories. Social Cognition 7:262-74.[Web of Science]
• Charles, Maria, and Karen Bradley. 2009. Indulging our gendered selves: Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology 114, forthcoming.
• Charles, Maria, and David B. Grusky 2004. Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Chwe, Michael Suk-Young. 2001. Rational ritual: Culture, coordination, and common knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Conway, Michael, M. Teresa Pizzamiglio, and Lauren Mount. 1996. Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71:25-38.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Eagly, Alice H., and Stephen J. Karau. 2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice towards female leaders. Psychological Review 109:573-79.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Fenstermaker, Sarah, and Candace West, eds. 2002. Doing gender, doing difference: Inequality, power, and institutional change. New York: Routledge.
• Filardo, Emily K. 1996. Gender patterns in African American and white adolescents' social interactions in same-race, mixed-sex groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71:71-82.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Fiske, Susan T. 1998. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In The handbook of social psychology, vol. 2, edited by D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey. 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
• Fiske, Susan T., Amy J. Cuddy, Peter Glick, and Jun Xu. 2002. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82:878-902.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Glick, Peter, and Susan T. Fiske. 1999. Gender, power dynamics, and social interaction. In Revisioning gender, edited by M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, and B. B. Hess. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
• Ito, Tiffany A., and Geoffrey R. Urland. 2003. Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85:616-26.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Jackman, Mary. R. 1994. The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Kunda, Ziva, and Steven J. Spencer. 2003. When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin 129:522-44.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Lorber, Judith. 1994. Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Martin, Patricia Y. 2003. "Said and done" versus "saying and doing": Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society 17:342-66.[Abstract]
• McIllwee, Judith S., and J. Gregg Robinson. 1992. Women in engineering: Gender power, and workplace culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Milkie, Melissa A. 1999. Social comparison, reflected appraisals, and mass media: The impact of pervasive beauty images on Black and white girls' self-concepts. Social Psychology Quarterly 62:190-210.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Nelson, Robert, and William Bridges. 1999. Legalizing gender inequality: Courts, markets, and unequal pay for women in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Reskin, Barbara, and Debra Branch McBrier. 2000. Why not ascription? Organizations' employment of male and female managers. American Sociological Review 65:210-33.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 1997. Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review 62:218-35.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• ---. 2006. Gender as an organizing force in social relations: Implications for the future of inequality. In The declining significance of gender? edited by F. D. Blau, M. C. Brinton, and D. B. Grusky. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• ---. 2007. Gender as a group process: Implications for the persistence of inequality. In The social psychology of gender, edited by S. J. Correll. New York: Elsevier.
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Shelley J. Correll. 2004. Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society 18 (4): 510-31.[Abstract]
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Paula England. 2007. Sociological approaches to sex discrimination in employment. In Sex discrimination in the workplace: Multidisciplinary perspectives, edited by F. J. Crosby, M. S. Stockdale, and A. S. Ropp. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 1999. The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology 25:1991-216.
• Risman, Barbara J. 1998. Gender vertigo: American families in transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• ---. 2004. Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society 18:429-50.[Abstract]
• Rudman, Laurie. A., and Kimberly Fairchild. 2004. Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87:157-76.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Schneider, David J. 2004. The psychology of stereotyping. New York: Guilford.
• Smith-Doerr, Laurel. 2004. Women's work: Gender equality vs. hierarchy in the life sciences. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
• Stangor, Charles, Laure Lynch, Changming Duan, and Beth Glass. 1992. Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62:207-18.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Steinberg, Ronnie J. 1995. Gendered instructions: Cultural lag and gender bias in the hay system of job evaluation. In Gender inequality at work, edited by J. A. Jacobs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Wagner, David G., and Joseph Berger. 1997. Gender and interpersonal task behaviors: Status expectation accounts. Sociological Perspectives 40:1-32.[Web of Science]
• West, Candace, and Don Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & Society 1:125-51.[Abstract]
• Whittington, Kjersten Bunker. 2007. Employment structures as opportunity structures: The effects of location on male and female scientific dissemination. Stanford, CA: Department of Sociology, Stanford University.
• Whittington, Kjersten Bunker, and Laurel Smith-Doerr. 2008. Women inventors in context: Disparities in patenting across academia and industry. Gender & Society 22:194-218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This version was published on April 1, 2009

Gender & Society, Vol. 23, No. 2, 145-160 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0891243208330313


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Hamilton and E. A. Armstrong Gendered Sexuality in Young Adulthood: Double Binds and Flawed Options Gender Society, October 1, 2009; 23(5): 589 - 616. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ridgeway, C. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?