Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Gender & Society
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gorman, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kmec, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

We (Have to) Try Harder

Gender and Required Work Effort in Britain and the United States

Elizabeth H. Gorman

University of Virginia

Julie A. Kmec

Washington State University

Across three decades in both Britain and the United States, surveys indicate that women must work harder than men do. Using data from the 1997 Skills Survey of the Employed British Workforce (U.K.) and the 1997 National Study of the Changing Workforce (U.S.), the authors investigate two possible explanations for this gap in reports of required effort: gender differences in job characteristics and family responsibilities. In multivariate ordered logistic regressions, extensive measures of job characteristics do not explain the difference between women and men. Family obligations, as well, account for little or none of the gap. The authors argue that the association between gender and reported required work effort is best interpreted as reflecting stricter performance standards imposed on women, even when women and men hold the same jobs. The authors discuss alternative interpretations and implications for research.

Key Words: employer bias • gendered performance expectations • work effort

References

  • Barker, James R. 1993. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 38:408-37.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bianchi, Suzanne. 2000. Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography 37:401-14.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bianchi, Suzanne, Melissa Milkie, Liana Sayer, and John Robinson. 2000. Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces 79:191-228.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bielby, Denise, and William Bielby. 1988. She works hard for the money: Household responsibilities and the allocation of work effort. American Journal of Sociology 93:1031-59.[CrossRef]
  • Bielby, William, and Denise Bielby. 2001. Telling stories about gender and effort: Social science narratives about who works hard for the money. In The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field, edited by M. Guillén, R. Collins, P. England, and M. Meyer. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Biernat, M., and D. Kobrynowicz. 1997. Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72:544-57.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bowen, Chieh-Chen, Janet K. Swim, and Rick Jacobs. 2000. Evaluating gender biases on actual job performance of real people: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30:2194-215.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Britton, Dana. 1997. Gendered organizational logic: Policy and practice in men's and women's prisons. Gender & Society 11:796-818.[Abstract]
  • Conway, Michael, M. Teresa Pizzamiglio, and Lauren Mount. 1996. Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71:25-38.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Crouter, Ann, Matthew Bumpus, Melissa Head, and Susan McHale. 2001. Implications of overwork and overload for the quality of men's family relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family 63:404-16.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Day, Arla, and Holly Livingstone. 2003. Gender differences in perceptions of stressors and utilization of social support among university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 35:73-83.
  • De Jonge, Jan, and Wilmar Schaufeli. 1998. Job characteristics and employee well-being: A test of Warr's vitamin model in health care workers using structural equation modeling. Journal of Organizational Behavior 19:387-407.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Demerouti, Evangelia, Arnold Bakker, Friedhelm Nachreiner, and Wilmar Schaufeli. 2001. The job demands—job resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology 86:499-512.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Dwyer, Deborah, and Daniel Ganster. 1991. The effects of job demands and control on employee attendance and satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior 12:595-608.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Families and Work Institute. 2001. National study of the changing workforce: Guide to 1997 public use files. Families and Work Institute, New York.
  • Felstead, Alan, Duncan Gallie, and Francis Green. 2002. Work skills in Britain 1986—2001. Canterbury, UK: University of Kent.
  • Fiske, Susan T., Amy J. C. Cuddy, Peter Glick, and Jun Xu. 2002. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82:878-902.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fletcher, Joyce. 1999. Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Foschi, Martha. 1996. Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Social Psychology Quarterly 59:237-54.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Fox, M.L., D.J. Dwyer, and Daniel Ganster. 1993. Effects of stressful job demands and control on physiological and attitudinal outcomes in a hospital setting. Academy of Management Journal 26:289-318.
  • Fusilier, Marcelline, Daniel Ganster, and Bronston Mayes. 1986. The social support and health relationship: Is there a gender difference? Journal of Occupational Psychology 59:145-53.[Web of Science]
  • Ganster, Daniel, M.L. Fox, and D.J. Dwyer. 2001. Explaining employees' health care costs: A prospective examination of stressful job demands, personal control, and physiological reactivity. Journal of Applied Psychology 86:954-64.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Graham, Laurie. 1995. On the line at Subaru-Isuzu: The Japanese model and the American worker. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
  • Green, Francis. 2004. Why has work effort become more intense? Industrial Relations 43:709-41.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • ———. 2006. Demanding work: The paradox of job quality in the affluent economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hagan, John, and Fiona Kay. 2007. Even lawyers get the blues: Gender, depression, and job satisfaction in legal practice. Law and Society Review 41:51-78.[CrossRef]
  • Hambrick, Donald, Sydney Finkelstein, and Ann Mooney. 2005. Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review 30:472-91.[Web of Science]
  • Heilman, Madeline E. 2001. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues 57:657-74.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Heilman, Madeline E., Caryn J. Block, Richard F. Martell, and Michael C. Simon. 1989. Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology 74:935-42.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Heilman, Madeline E., and Michelle C. Haynes. 2005. No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women's success in male—female teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 90:905-16.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hochschild, Arlie. 1983. The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Hodson, Randy. 1989. Gender differences in job satisfaction: Why aren't women more dissatisfied? The Sociological Quarterly 30:385-99.[CrossRef]
  • Jacobs, Jerry, and Ronnie Steinberg. 1990. Compensating differentials and the male—female wage gap: Evidence from the New York State Comparable Worth Study. Social Forces 69:439-68.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Keaveny, Timothy J., and Edward J. Inderrieden. 1999. Gender differences in employer-supported training and education. Journal of Vocational Behavior 54:71-81.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Kidwell, Roland, and Nathan Bennett. 1993. Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Academy of Management Review 18:429-56.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Kilbourne, Barbara, Paula England, George Farkas, Kurt Beron, and Dorothea Weir. 1994. Returns to skill, compensating differentials, and gender bias: Effects of occupational characteristics on the wages of white women and men. American Journal of Sociology 100:689-719.[CrossRef]
  • Kuijer, P. Paul, Bart Visser, and Han Kemper. 1999. Job rotation as a factor in reducing physical workload at a refuse collecting department. Ergonomics 42:1167-78.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kunda, Gideon. 1992. Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Loscocco, Karen, and Glenna Spitze. 1990. Working conditions, social support, and the well-being of female and male factory workers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 31:313-27.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Major, Brenda, Dean McFarlin, and Diana Gagnon. 1984. Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47:1399-412.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Meijman, T., F. Zijistron, M. Kompier, H. Mulders, and J. Broevse. 1986. The measurement of perceived effort. In Contemporary ergonomics, edited by D. Osborne, 242-46. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Padavic, Irene, and Barbara Reskin. 2002. Women and men at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
  • Perrewe, Pamela, and Daniel Ganster. 1991. The impact of job demands and behavioral control on experienced job stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior 10:213-29.[CrossRef]
  • Petrie, Michelle, and Paul Roman. 2004. Race and gender differences in workplace autonomy: A research note. Sociological Inquiry 74:590-603.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Pierce, Jennifer L. 1995. Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Reynolds, Jeremy. 2006a. Teams, teams everywhere? The use of work teams within U.S. establishments. Social Science Research 35 (1), 252-78.[Web of Science]
  • ———. 2006b. You get paid for that?: Job and establishment level variations in the use of incentive compensation. Research in the Sociology of Work 16:117-49.[CrossRef]
  • Ridgeway, Cecilia. 1982. Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review 47:76-88.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Ridgeway, Cecilia, and Shelley Correll. 2004. Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society 18:510-31.[Abstract]
  • Roberts, Nicole, and Robert Levenson. 2001. The remains of the workday: Impact of job stress and exhaustion on marital interaction in police couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family 63:1052-67.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Roxburgh, Susan. 1996. Gender differences in work and well-being: Effects of exposure and vulnerability. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 37:265-77.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Schieman, Scott. 2006. Gender, dimensions of work, and supportive coworker relations. The Sociological Quarterly 47:195-214.[CrossRef]
  • Smith, Ryan. 2002. Race, gender, and authority in the workplace: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology 28:509-42.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Swim, Janet K., and Lawrence J. Sanna. 1996. He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers' attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22:507-19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald, Catherine Zimmer, Kevin Stainback, Corre Robinson, Tiffany Taylor, and Tricia McTague. 2006. Documenting desegregation: Segregation in American workplaces by race, ethnicity, and sex 1966-2000. American Sociological Review 71:565-88.[Web of Science]
  • U.S. Census Bureau. 1999. Computer use in the United States (PPL-114). U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Washington, DC.
  • Valian, Virginia. 1998. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Wooldridge, Jeffrey. 2003. Introductory econometrics. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.
  • Xie, Jia Lin, and Gary Johns. 1995. Job scope and stress: Can job scope be too high? Academy of Management Journal 38:1288-1309.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Gender & Society, Vol. 21, No. 6, 828-856 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0891243207309900
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Gender SocietyHome page
P. Van Echtelt, A. Glebbeek, S. Lewis, and S. Lindenberg
Post-Fordist Work: A Man's World?: Gender and Working Overtime in the Netherlands
Gender Society, April 1, 2009; 23(2): 188 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gorman, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kmec, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?