Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chong, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 20, No. 6, 697-724 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0891243206291111

Negotiating Patriarchy

South Korean Evangelical Women and the Politics of Gender

Kelly H. Chong

University of Kansas, Lawrence

Based on ethnographic research, this study investigates the meaning and impact of women’s involvement in South Korean evangelicalism. While recent works addressing the "paradox" of women’s participation in conservative religions have highlighted the significance of these religions as unexpected vehicles of gender empowerment and contestation, this study finds that the experiences and consequences of Korean evangelical women’s religiosity are highly contradictory; although crucial in women’s efforts to negotiate the injuries of the modern Confucian-patriarchal family, conversion, for many women, also signifies their effective redomestication to this family/gender regime, which helps maintain current gender arrangements. To address this tension, the article explores the meaning of religious submission in the Korean context, focusing on the motivations behind women’s consent to patriarchy, which are rooted in women’s contradictory desires regarding the family system and the ambivalent subjectivities that they evoke.

Key Words: religious traditionalism • patriarchy • South Korea • evangelicalism • consent • resistance

References

  • Abelmann, Nancy. 1997. Women’s class mobility and identities in South Korea: A gendered, transnational, narrative approach. Journal of Asian Studies 56 (2): 398-421.[CrossRef]
  • Abelmann, Nancy. 2003. The melodrama of mobility: Women, talk, and class in contemporary South Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
  • Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1990. The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist 17 (1): 41-55.
  • Ammerman, Nancy. 1987. Bible believers: Fundamentalists in the modern world. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
  • Appleby, R. Scott. 2000. The ambivalence of the sacred: Religion, violence, and reconciliation. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Bainbridge, W. S. 1992. The sociology of conversion. In Handbook of religious conversion, edited by H. N. Malony and S. Southard. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.
  • Baron, Ava. 1991. Work engendered. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
  • Bartkowski, John P. 2001. Remaking the godly marriage: Gender negotiation in evangelical churches. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
  • Brasher, Brenda E. 1998. Godly women: Fundamentalism & female power. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
  • Brinton, M. C., Y. Lee, and W. L. Parish. 1995. Married women’s employment in rapidly industrializing societies: Examples from East Asia. American Journal of Sociology 100 (5): 1099-1130.[CrossRef]
  • Brusco, Elizabeth E. 1995. The reformation of the machismo: Evangelical conversion and gender in Colombia. Austin: University of Texas.
  • Burdick, John. 1993. Looking for God in Brazil: The progressive Catholic church in urban Brazil’s religious arena. Berkeley: University of California.
  • Cho, H. 1986. Male dominance and mother power: The two sides of Confucian patriarchy in Korea. In The psycho-cultural dynamics of the Confucian family: Past and present, edited by W. H. Slote. Seoul: International Cultural Society of Korea.
  • Cho, H. 2002. Living with conflicting subjectivities: Mother, motherly wife, and sexy woman in the transition of colonial-modern to postmodern Korea. In Under construction: The gendering of modernity, class, and consumption in the Republic of Korea, edited by Laurel Kendall. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
  • Choi, E. 1994. Status of the family and motherhood for Korean women. In Women of Japan and Korea: Continuity and Change, edited by J. Gelb and M. L. Palley. Philadelphia: Temple University.
  • Chong, K. H. 2002. Agony in prosperity: Evangelicalism, women, and the politics of gender in South Korea. Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.
  • Clark, Donald N. 1986. Christianity in modern Korea. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
  • Davidman, Lynn. 1991. Tradition in a rootless world: Women turn to orthodox Judaism. Berkeley: University of California.
  • Deuchler, Martina. 1992. The Confucian transformation of Korea: A study of society and ideology. Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.
  • Foucault, Michel. [1978] 1990. The history of sexuality. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage.
  • Gallagher, Sally K. 2003. Evangelical identity & gendered family life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
  • Gallagher, S. K., and C. Smith. 1999. Symbolic traditionalism and pragmatic egalitarianism: Contemporary evangelicals, families, and gender. Gender & Society 13: 211-233.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Gallup Korea. 1998. Hanguk gaesin-gyoin-ui gyohoe hwaldong mit sinang-uisik josa bogoso (Investigation and report on the church activities and religiosity of Korean protestants). Seoul: Gallup Korea.
  • Gill, Lesley. 1990. "Like a veil to cover them": Women and the Pentecostal movement in La Paz. American Ethnologist 17 (4): 708-721.[CrossRef]
  • Gramsci, Antonio. 1992. Prison notebooks. New York: Columbia University.
  • Griffith, R. Marie. 1997. God’s daughters: Evangelical women and the power of submission. Berkeley: University of California.
  • Han, Gil Soo. 1994. Social sources of church growth: Korean churches in the homeland and overseas. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
  • Hartmann, H. 1981. The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism. In Women and revolution, edited by L. Sargent. Boston: South End.
  • Ingersoll, Julie. 2003. Evangelical Christian women: War stories in the gender battles. New York: New York University Press.
  • Kandiyoti, Deniz. 1987. Emancipated but unliberated? Reflections on the Turkish case. Feminist Studies 3 (2): 317-338.
  • Kandiyoti, Deniz. 1988. Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society 2: 274-290.[Abstract]
  • Kaufman, Debra. 1989. Patriarchal women: A case study of newly orthodox Jewish women. Symbolic Interaction 12 (2): 299-314.
  • Kendall, Laurel. 1996. Getting married in Korea: Of gender, morality, and modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Kendall, Laurel, ed. 2002. Under construction: The gendering of modernity, class, and consumption in the Republic of Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Kim, Byong-Suh. 1985. The explosive growth of the Korean churches today: A sociological analysis. International Review of Mission 74 (January): 61-74.
  • Kim, Myung-Hye. 1992. Late industrialization and women’s work in urban South Korea: An ethnographic study of upper-middle-class families. City & Society 6 (2): 156-173.[CrossRef]
  • Kim, Seung Kyung. 1997. Class struggle or family struggle? Lives of women factory workers in South Korea. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lee, S. 2002. The concept of female sexuality in Korean popular culture. In Under construction: The gendering of modernity, class, and consumption in the Republic of Korea, edited by L. Kendall, 141-164. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Lee, T. 1996. Born again in Korea: The rise and character of revivalism in (South) Korea, 1885-1988. Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.
  • Lett, Denise. 1998. In pursuit of status: The making of South Korea’s "new" urban middle class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center.
  • Lofland, John, and Rodney Stark. 1966. Becoming a world-saver. American Sociological Review 30: 862-875.
  • Mahmood, Saba. 2001. Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology 16 (2): 202-236.[CrossRef]
  • Maldonado, J. E. 1993. Building "fundamentalism" from the family in Latin America. In Fundamentalisms and society: Reclaiming the sciences, the family, and education, edited by M. E. Mary and R. S. Appleby, 214-239. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  • Manning, Christel. 1999. God gave us the right: Conservative Catholic, evangelical Protestant, and Orthodox Jewish women grapple with feminism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
  • Martin, David. 1990. Tongues of fire: The explosion of Protestantism in Latin America. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
  • McGuire, Meredith B. 1983. Discovering religious power. Sociological Analysis 44 (1): 1-10.
  • McLeod, Arlene Elowe. 1992. Hegemonic relations and gender resistance: The new veiling as accommodating protest in Cairo. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 17 (3): 533-557.[CrossRef]
  • Mohanty, C. 1991. Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In Third World women and the politics of feminism, edited by C. Mohanty, A. Russo, and L. Torres. Bloomington: Indiana University.
  • Moon, Okpyo. 1990. Urban middle class wives in contemporary Korea: Their roles, responsibilities and dilemma. Korea Journal 30 (11): 30-43.
  • Moon, Seungsook. 2002. Carving out space: Civil society and the women’s movement in South Korea. Journal of Asian Studies 61 (2): 473-500.[CrossRef]
  • Nelson, Laura. 2000. Measured excess: Status, gender, and consumer nationalism in South Korea. New York: Columbia University.
  • Ortner, Sherry B. 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26 (1): 126-166.[ISI]
  • Palley, Marian Lief. 1990. Women’s status in South Korea: Tradition and change. Asian Survey 30 (December): 1136-1153.
  • Papanek, Hanna. 1979. Family status production: The "work" and "non-work" of women. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 4: 775-781.
  • Rambo, L. R. 1992. The psychology of conversion. In Handbook of religious conversion, edited by H. N. Malony and S. Southard. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.
  • Rhi, B. 1986. Confucianism and mental health in Korea. In The psycho-cultural dynamics of the Confucian family: Past and present, edited by W. H. Slote. Seoul: International Cultural Society of Korea.
  • Rose, Susan. 1987. Women warriors: The negotiation of gender in a charismatic community. Sociological Analysis 48 (3): 245-258.
  • Rubin, Jeffrey W. 1996. Defining resistance: Contested interpretations of everyday acts. Studies in Law, Politics and Society 15: 237-260.
  • Stacey, Judith. 1990. Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late 20th century America. New York: Basic Books.
  • Suh, David Kwang-Sun. 1985. American missionaries and a hundred years of Korean Protestantism. International Review of Mission 74 (January): 6-19.
  • Williams, Raymond. 1973. Base and superstructure in Marxist cultural theory. New Left Review (82): 31-49.
  • Yi, Hyo-Jae. 1985. Christian mission and the liberation of Korean women. International Review of Mission 74 (January): 93-102.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
O. Avishai
"Doing Religion" In a Secular World: Women in Conservative Religions and the Question of Agency
Gender Society, August 1, 2008; 22(4): 409 - 433.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chong, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?