Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HANDLER, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 9, No. 2, 236-255 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/089124395009002006

IN THE FRATERNAL SISTERHOOD

Sororities as Gender Strategy

LISA HANDLER

State University of New York-Stony Brook

This article analyzes sororities as gender strategy. The author argues that young women use sororities as a strategy for dealing with the complexities of gender(ed) relations—both among women and between women and men. Based on a case study of a nationally affiliated historically white sorority, the article focuses primarily on how sororities structure relationships among women and between women and men, helping them to navigate campus life, particularly what Holland and Eisenhart have identified as a male-dominated culture of romance. Employing a language of sisterhood, sororities encourage strong bonds between members; still, they fail to resolve tensions between the collective interests of the sororities and the individualistic strategies of members in the romantic marketplace. It is argued that, while sororities can be seen as a collective response to male domination, they are not a challenge to it.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
L. Hamilton
Trading On Heterosexuality: College Women's Gender Strategies and Homophobia
Gender Society, April 1, 2007; 21(2): 145 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
K. M. Anderson and F. S. Danis
Collegiate Sororities and Dating Violence: An Exploratory Study of Informal and Formal Helping Strategies
Violence Against Women, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 87 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
A. BERKOWITZ and I. PADAVIC
GETTING A MAN OR GETTING AHEAD: A Comparison of White and Black Sororities
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, January 1, 1999; 27(4): 530 - 557.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
H. A. Berger, L. S. Shaffer, B. Freeman-Witthoft, and H. A. Freund
Friends and Lovers
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 1998; 15(5): 623 - 636.
[Abstract]