Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FRIED, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 8, No. 4, 562-583 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/089124394008004006

"IT'S HARD TO CHANGE WHAT WE WANT TO CHANGE"

Rape Crisis Centers as Organizations

AMY FRIED

Colgate University

Like other groups associated with social movements, rape crisis centers have been judged co-optive by some and progressive by others. This article argues that organizational theory yields fuller explanations of their dynamics and character. In a case study, two subcultures—dubbed the politicized and service perspectives—developed and epitomized fundamentally different approaches to sexual violence. These subcultures emerged for a number of reasons, including the organization's goals, the character of the fiminist movement, and organizational features such as permeability, a broad constituency, a collective goods orientation, and an emphasis on open discourse. This article argues that similar organizational and environmental features in rape crisis centers and other social movement-related organizations are associated with organizational fluidity and conflict. While these groups may not be cohesive and stable actors for broad social change, they contribute incrementally to long-term shifts in gendered social structures.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Feminist CriminologyHome page
S. L. Maier
Are Rape Crisis Centers Feminist Organizations?
Feminist Criminology, April 1, 2008; 3(2): 82 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
S. A. Ostrander
Moderating Contradictions of Feminist Philanthropy: Women's Community Organizations and the Boston Women's Fund, 1995 to 2000
Gender Society, February 1, 2004; 18(1): 29 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
L. GRAUERHOLZ, H. GOTTFRIED, C. STOHL, and N. GABIN
There's Safety in Numbers: Creating a Campus Advisers' Network to Help Complainants of Sexual Harassment and Complaint Receivers
Violence Against Women, August 1, 1999; 5(8): 950 - 977.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
F. E. SCHMITT and P. Y. MARTIN
UNOBTRUSIVE MOBILIZATION BY AN INSTITUTIONALIZED RAPE CRISIS CENTER: "All We Do Comes from Victims"
Gender Society, June 1, 1999; 13(3): 364 - 384.
[Abstract] [PDF]