This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BUSH, D. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

WOMEN'S MOVEMENTS AND STATE POLICY REFORM AIMED AT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN:

A Comparison of the Consequences of Movement Mobilization in the U.S. and India

Colorado State University

This article compares the social movement mobilization that led to reforms in police and judicial handling of battering in the United States to the movement ideology, organization, and tactics that resulted in analogous policy reform in the processing of dowry burnings and beatings in India. Using field notes and secondary sources from both countries, the article examines how both movements redefined violence against women in families as a public issue, then looks at how movement demands affected policy reform in each country. The analysis questions the current conceptualization of social movement success. Social movements theory assumes that entry into the polity of liberal, democratic states constitutes success in the sense of social change. Yet the cases analyzed suggest that assumptions about the gender neutrality of state response to movements prevents researchers from critically examining the outcomes of social movement mobilization. Moreover, institutionalization of women's movement demands and organization may diminish the capacity of such movements to control the social construction of domestic violence against women by providing protection without empowerment.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Tellez Community of Struggle: Gender, Violence, and Resistance on the U.S./Mexico Border Gender Society, October 1, 2008; 22(5): 545 - 567. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Mirchandani "Hitting is not Manly": Domestic Violence Court and the Re-Imagination of the Patriarchal State Gender Society, December 1, 2006; 20(6): 781 - 804. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Miller A specification of the types of intimate partner violence experienced by women in the general population. Violence Against Women, December 1, 2006; 12(12): 1105 - 1131. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. FERNANDEZ Domestic Violence by Extended Family Members in India: Interplay of Gender and Generation J Interpers Violence, June 1, 1997; 12(3): 433 - 455. [Abstract]

				M. ABRAHAM ETHNICITY, GENDER, AND MARITAL VIOLENCE: South Asian Women's Organizations in the United States Gender Society, August 1, 1995; 9(4): 450 - 468. [Abstract]