Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information!

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COLTRANE, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 6, No. 1, 86-107 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/089124392006001006

THE MICROPOLITICS OF GENDER IN NONINDUSTRIAL SOCIETIES

SCOTT COLTRANE

University of California, Riverside

Regression analysis using coded ethnographic data from a sample of 93 nonindustrial societies showed that patterns of child rearing and property control are significantly associated with outward displays of men's dominance. In societies in which women exercise significant control over property and men have close relationships with children, men infrequently affirm their manliness through boastful demonstrations of strength, aggressiveness, and sexual potency. Under these conditions, women show less deference to men, and husbands are less likely to dominate wives. Displays of manliness are also prevalent in less complex societies with frequent warfare. An ideology of women's inferiority was found to be most common in complex societies with distant father-child relationships. Illustrative cases are presented, and theoretical explanations for observed correlations are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cross-Cultural ResearchHome page
L. Hendrix
Quality and Equality in Marriage: A Cross- Cultural View
Cross-Cultural Research, January 1, 1997; 31(3): 201 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
D. LISAK and C. IVAN
Deficits in Intimacy and Empathy in Sexually Aggressive Men
J Interpers Violence, September 1, 1995; 10(3): 296 - 308.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
L. SANCHEZ
Material Resources, Family Structure Resources, and Husbands' Housework Participation: A Cross-National Comparison
Journal of Family Issues, September 1, 1994; 15(3): 379 - 402.
[Abstract]


Home page
Cross-Cultural ResearchHome page
G. M. Erchak and R. Rosenfeld
Societal Isolation, Violent Norms, and Gender Relations: A Reexamination and Extension of Levinson's Model of Wife Beating
Cross-Cultural Research, May 1, 1994; 28(2): 111 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]