Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GORELICK, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 5, No. 4, 459-477 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/089124391005004002

CONTRADICTIONS OF FEMINIST METHODOLOGY

SHERRY GORELICK

Rutgers University

Many feminists have aruged that researchers must "give voice" to hitherto silenced women by adopting "the view from below." Critically reviewing the literature on feminist methodology, the author argues that this perspective, while absolutely essential, is not sufficient. Confining research to induction-based methods ignores the limits to such research: Ideologies of oppression are often internalized, while the underlying structures of oppression are hidden. Marxist approaches may help reveal hidden determinants of oppression, but they risk exacerbating inequalities between researcher and researched. Women's experience of a world shaped (and often segregated) by structures of inequality produces contradictory relationships among researcher and researched and requires a methodology that deals with difference and the blindness of privilege among women. Women's oppression is "a complex of many contradictions" and necessitates a new standpoint-based methodology, created by researchers and participants of diverse race, class, and other oppressed groups, refocusing and re-visioning knowledge based on theory, action, and experience.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
R. E. Latta and L. A. Goodman
Considering the Interplay of Cultural Context and Service Provision in Intimate Partner Violence: The Case of Haitian Immigrant Women
Violence Against Women, November 1, 2005; 11(11): 1441 - 1464.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
L. Nichols and K. M. Feltey
"The Woman is Not Always the Bad Guy": Dominant Discourse and Resistance in the Lives of Battered Women
Violence Against Women, July 1, 2003; 9(7): 784 - 806.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
H. N. Bui
Help-Seeking Behavior Among Abused Immigrant Women: A Case of Vietnamese American Women
Violence Against Women, February 1, 2003; 9(2): 207 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
S. Riger
Guest Editor's Introduction: Working Together: Challenges in Collaborative Research on Violence Against Women
Violence Against Women, October 1, 1999; 5(10): 1099 - 1117.
[PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
L. WALTER
FEMINIST ANTHROPOLOGY?
Gender Society, June 1, 1995; 9(3): 272 - 288.
[Abstract]