Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DALY, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 3, No. 1, 9-36 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/089124389003001002

RETHINKING JUDICIAL PATERNALISM:

Gender, Work-Family Relations, and Sentencing

KATHLEEN DALY

Yale University

Many scholars think that women are sentenced more leniently than men because judges are paternalistic toward women. In this article, I suggest that paternalism is a multilayered concept and that it is important to distinguish between judicial concerns for protecting women and those for protecting children and families. To learn what factors judges consider in sentencing and whether these differ for men and women defendants, I interviewed 20 men and 3 women judges in two state criminal courts. I learned that the primary objects of judicial protection were not women, but children, and men's and women's economic support or care for families. However, there was a labor hierarchy in the judges' minds in that they believed that care giving was more important than wage earning for the maintenance of families. Interactive influences among the defendant's gender, familial status, race or ethnicity, and the nature of the offense charged are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
R. Mirchandani
"Hitting is not Manly": Domestic Violence Court and the Re-Imagination of the Patriarchal State
Gender Society, December 1, 2006; 20(6): 781 - 804.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminist CriminologyHome page
A. Burgess-Proctor
Intersections of Race, Class, Gender, and Crime: Future Directions for Feminist Criminology
Feminist Criminology, January 1, 2006; 1(1): 27 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
J. FLAVIN
OF PUNISHMENT AND PARENTHOOD: Family-Based Social Control and the Sentencing of Black Drug Offenders
Gender Society, August 1, 2001; 15(4): 611 - 633.
[Abstract] [PDF]