Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Gender & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCULLY, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CONVICTED RAPISTS' PERCEPTIONS OF SELF AND VICTIM:

Role Taking and Emotions

DIANA SCULLY

Virginia Commonwealth University

This article is an attempt to bridge the gap between feminist structural explanations for rape and the social psychological mechanisms that make it possible for some men in patriarchal societies to feel neutral about sexual violence toward women. The concept of role taking is used to analyze the perceptions of self and victim held by 79 convicted rapists. Men who defined their behavior during sexual encounters as rape saw themselves from the perspective of their victim through reflexive role taking, had inferred their victims' experience through synesic role taking, and used this awareness to further their plan of action. Men who did not define their behavior as rape did neither reflexive nor synesic role taking and appeared incapable of understanding the meaning of sexual violence to women. The majority of both groups did not experience role-taking emotions, that is, guilt, shame, or empathy, which symbolic interactionists posit are the mediators of self-control. I argue that the gender imbalance of power and the status of women as property are the social factors that render normative emotions inoperative in sexual violence.

Gender & Society, Vol. 2, No. 2, 200-213 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/089124388002002005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
D. P. Schrock and I. Padavic
Negotiating Hegemonic Masculinity in a Batterer Intervention Program
Gender Society, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 625 - 649.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
D. LISAK and C. IVAN
Deficits in Intimacy and Empathy in Sexually Aggressive Men
J Interpers Violence, September 1, 1995; 10(3): 296 - 308.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
S.P. Schacht and P. H. Atchison
Heterosexual Instrumentalism: Past and Future Directions
Feminism Psychology, February 1, 1993; 3(1): 37 - 53.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
M. M. FONOW, L. RICHARDSON, and V. A. WEMMERUS
FEMINIST RAPE EDUCATION:: Does It Work?
Gender Society, March 1, 1992; 6(1): 108 - 121.
[Abstract]