Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Gender & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

"Not all Differences are Created Equal"

Multiple Jeopardy in a Gendered Organization

Jane Ward

University of California, Santa Barbara

The dictate in feminist intersectional theory to not "count oppressions" is difficult to reconcile with the experience of many lesbians of color that "not all differences are created equal" inside social movement organizations. Meso-level factors, such as organizational structure and sociopolitical environment, may result in the perception of individuals or groups that one form of structural inequality is more oppressive than others. The author focuses on the experiences of lesbian staff and clients at Bienestar, a large Latino health organization in Los Angeles focusing primarily on HIV/AIDS prevention and education. This study demonstrates that oppression can be experienced as additive and that counting and ranking oppressions may remain a common practice and important political strategy in the context of some social movement organizations. This article also responds to the need for more research that builds on the gendered organizations approach by examining some of the factors that contribute to change in organizational gender ideology and practices.

Key Words: multiple jeopardy • feminist intersectional theory • gendered organizations • lesbians of color • AIDS organizations

Gender & Society, Vol. 18, No. 1, 82-102 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0891243203259503


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
M. L. Craig and R. Liberti
"'Cause That's What Girls Do": The Making of a Feminized Gym
Gender Society, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 676 - 699.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
C. J. Cranford
"It's Time to Leave Machismo Behind!": Challenging Gender Inequality in an Immigrant Union
Gender Society, June 1, 2007; 21(3): 409 - 438.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AffiliaHome page
L. Barnoff and K. Moffatt
Contradictory Tensions in Anti-Oppression Practice in Feminist Social Services
Affilia, February 1, 2007; 22(1): 56 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]