Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TSUI, M.
Right arrow Articles by RICH, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 16, No. 1, 74-92 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0891243202016001005

The Only Child and Educational Opportunity for Girls in Urban China

MING TSUI

Millsaps College tsuim{at}millsaps.edu

LYNNE RICH

Mississippi State University

Using data from the authors' 1998-99 survey of 1,040 eighth graders in Wuhan, China, this study explores the differences between single-girl and single-boy families with regard to parental expectation and investment in children's education, children's own educational aspirations, and mathematics performance. The authors found that contrary to the known intrafamily discrimination against girls common among families of pre-one-child generations and still common among contemporary rural families with more than one child, there are no gender differences related to education between single-girl and single-boy families in modern urban China. The authors found equally high educational aspirations and similar mathematical performance for male and female only children. They suggest that this gender equality in education is an unintended consequence of the one-child-per-family policy and that under China's current social and economic conditions, girls are better off living in one-child families in the big cities of modern China.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
H. J. Zhan, Xiaotian Feng, and Baozhen Luo
Placing Elderly Parents in Institutions in Urban China: A Reinterpretation of Filial Piety
Research on Aging, September 1, 2008; 30(5): 543 - 571.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Games and CultureHome page
W. Wu, S. Fore, X. Wang, and P. S. Y. Ho
Beyond Virtual Carnival and Masquerade: In-Game Marriage on the Chinese Internet
Games and Culture, January 1, 2007; 2(1): 59 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
F. M. Deutsch
Filial Piety, Patrilineality, and China's One-Child Policy
Journal of Family Issues, March 1, 2006; 27(3): 366 - 389.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Education and Urban SocietyHome page
M. Tsui
Family Income, Home Environment, Parenting, and Mathematics Achievement of Children in China and the United States
Education and Urban Society, May 1, 2005; 37(3): 336 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
H. J. Zhan and R. J. V. Montgomery
Gender And Elder Care In China: The Influence of Filial Piety and Structural Constraints
Gender Society, April 1, 2003; 17(2): 209 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]