Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HENSON, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by ROGERS, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 15, No. 2, 218-238 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/089124301015002004
© 2001 Sociologists for Women in Society

"WHY MARCIA YOU'VE CHANGED!"

Male Clerical Temporary Workers Doing Masculinity in a Feminized Occupation

KEVIN D. HENSON

Loyola University of Chicago

JACKIE KRASAS ROGERS

The Pennsylvania State University

This research provides a look at men doing gender in the highly feminized context of temporary clerical employment. Male clerical temporaries, as with other men who cross over into "women's work," face institutionalized challenges to their sense of masculinity. In particular, male clerical temporary workers face gender assessment—highlighting their failure to live up to the ideals of hegemonic masculinity. The resulting gender strategies these men adopt reveal how male clerical temporary workers "do masculinity"—often in a collaborative performance shaped by the gendered expectations of their agencies, their clients, and even themselves—to reassert the feminine identification of the job while at the same time rejecting its application to them. Paradoxically, rather than disrupting the gender order, the gender strategies used by these male clerical temporaries help to reproduce and naturalize the gendered organization of work and reinvigorate hegemonic masculinity and its domination over women and subaltern men.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DISCOURSE & COMMUNICATIONHome page
K. L. Ashcraft
Appreciating the 'work' of discourse: occupational identity and difference as organizing mechanisms in the case of commercial airline pilots
Discourse & Communication, February 1, 2007; 1(1): 9 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
M. Ollilainen and T. Calasanti
Metaphors at Work: Maintaining the Salience of Gender in Self-Managing Teams
Gender Society, February 1, 2007; 21(1): 5 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
A. Hanser
The Gendered Rice Bowl: The Sexual Politics of Service Work in Urban China
Gender Society, October 1, 2005; 19(5): 581 - 600.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
B. Montemurro
Add Men, Don't Stir: Reproducing Traditional Gender Roles in Modern Wedding Showers
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, February 1, 2005; 34(1): 6 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
K. Dellinger
Masculinities in "Safe" and "Embattled" Organizations: Accounting for Pornographic and Feminist Magazines
Gender Society, October 1, 2004; 18(5): 545 - 566.
[Abstract] [PDF]