Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information!

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRITTON, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 14, No. 3, 418-434 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/089124300014003004
© 2000 Sociologists for Women in Society

Other

THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE GENDERED ORGANIZATION

DANA M. BRITTON

Kansas State University

Considerable attention has been paid recently to the gendering of organizations and occupations. Unfortunately, the gendered-organizations approach remains theoretically and empirically underdeveloped, as there have as yet been few clear answers to the question central to the perspective: What does it really mean to say that an organization itself, or a policy, practice, or slot in the hierarchy, is "gendered"? Reviewing literature in the gendered-organizations tradition, the author discusses three of the most common ways the perspective has been applied and argues that all of these definitions pose potential problems for the project of meaningful social and organizational change. The article concludes with some suggestions about how a more useful conception of the gendered organization might be built.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
J. Mcquillan, A. L. Greil, K. M. Shreffler, and V. Tichenor
The Importance of Motherhood Among Women in the Contemporary United States
Gender Society, August 1, 2008; 22(4): 477 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
K. Price
"Keeping The Dancers In Check": The Gendered Organization of Stripping Work in The Lion's Den
Gender Society, June 1, 2008; 22(3): 367 - 389.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
K. B. Whittington and L. Smith-Doerr
Women Inventors in Context: Disparities in Patenting across Academia and Industry
Gender Society, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 194 - 218.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
M. L. Craig and R. Liberti
"'Cause That's What Girls Do": The Making of a Feminized Gym
Gender Society, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 676 - 699.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
M. Duffy
Doing the Dirty Work: Gender, Race, and Reproductive Labor in Historical Perspective
Gender Society, June 1, 2007; 21(3): 313 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
L. Haas and C. P. Hwang
Gender and Organizational Culture: Correlates of Companies' Responsiveness to Fathers in Sweden
Gender Society, February 1, 2007; 21(1): 52 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
J. N. Baron, M. T. Hannan, G. Hsu, and O. Kocak
In the Company of Women: Gender Inequality and the Logic of Bureaucracy in Start-Up Firms
Work and Occupations, February 1, 2007; 34(1): 35 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
L. A. Morgan and K. A. Martin
Taking Women Professionals Out of the Office: The Case of Women in Sales
Gender Society, February 1, 2006; 20(1): 108 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
J. A. Kmec
Setting Occupational Sex Segregation in Motion: Demand-Side Explanations of Sex Traditional Employment
Work and Occupations, August 1, 2005; 32(3): 322 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
W. Cadge
Gendered Religious Organizations: The Case of Theravada Buddhism in America
Gender Society, December 1, 2004; 18(6): 777 - 793.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
J. Ward
"Not all Differences are Created Equal": Multiple Jeopardy in a Gendered Organization
Gender Society, February 1, 2004; 18(1): 82 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
E. Skuratowicz and L. W. Hunter
Where Do Women's Jobs Come from?: Job Resegregation in an American Bank
Work and Occupations, February 1, 2004; 31(1): 73 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
P. Y. Martin
"Said and Done" Versus "Saying and Doing": Gendering Practices, Practicing Gender at Work
Gender Society, June 1, 2003; 17(3): 342 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
O. Leyser
Doing Masculinity in a Mental Hospital
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, June 1, 2003; 32(3): 336 - 359.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
J. A. McCorkel
Embodied Surveillance And The Gendering Of Punishment
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, February 1, 2003; 32(1): 41 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
G. M. McGUIRE
Gender, Race, and the Shadow Structure: A Study of Informal Networks and Inequality in a Work Organization
Gender Society, June 1, 2002; 16(3): 303 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
K. D. HENSON and J. K. ROGERS
"WHY MARCIA YOU'VE CHANGED!": Male Clerical Temporary Workers Doing Masculinity in a Feminized Occupation
Gender Society, April 1, 2001; 15(2): 218 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
D. M. BRITTON
Feminism in Criminology: Engendering the Outlaw
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, September 1, 2000; 571(1): 57 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]