Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BAXTER, J.
Right arrow Articles by WRIGHT, E. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 14, No. 2, 275-294 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/089124300014002004

THE GLASS CEILING HYPOTHESIS

A Comparative Study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia

JANEEN BAXTER

University of Tasmania

ERIK OLIN WRIGHT

University of Wisconsin-Madison

The general-case glass ceiling hypothesis states that not only is it more difficult for women than for men to be promoted up levels of authority hierarchies within workplaces but also that the obstacles women face relative to men become greater as they move up the hierarchy. Gender-based discrimination in promotions is not simply present across levels of hierarchy but is more intense at higher levels. Empirically, this implies that the relative rates of women being promoted to higher levels compared to men should decline with the level of the hierarchy. This article explores this hypothesis with data from three countries: the United States, Australia, and Sweden. The basic conclusion is that while there is strong evidence for a general gender gap in authority—the odds of women having authority are less than those of men—there is no evidence for systematic glass ceiling effects in the United States and only weak evidence for such effects in the other two countries.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Gender SocietyHome page
A. Prokos and I. Padavic
An Examination of Competing Explanations for the Pay Gap among Scientists and Engineers
Gender Society, August 1, 2005; 19(4): 523 - 543.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
E. van de Vliert and G. S. van der Vegt
Women and Wages Worldwide: How the National Proportion of Working Women Brings Underpayment into the Organization
Organization Studies, July 1, 2004; 25(6): 969 - 986.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Work and OccupationsHome page
M. Hultin
Some Take the Glass Escalator, Some Hit the Glass Ceiling?: Career Consequences of Occupational Sex Segregation
Work and Occupations, February 1, 2003; 30(1): 30 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Gender SocietyHome page
D. M. BRITTON and C. L. WILLIAMS
RESPONSE TO BAXTER AND WRIGHT
Gender Society, December 1, 2000; 14(6): 804 - 808.
[PDF]

Home page
 Gender SocietyHome page
M. M. FERREE and B. PURKAYASTHA
EQUALITY AND CUMULATIVE DISADVANTAGE: Response to Baxter and Wright
Gender Society, December 1, 2000; 14(6): 809 - 813.
[PDF]

Home page
 Gender SocietyHome page
E. O. WRIGHT and J. BAXTER
THE GLASS CEILING HYPOTHESIS: A Reply to Critics
Gender Society, December 1, 2000; 14(6): 814 - 821.
[PDF]