|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
THE GLASS CEILING HYPOTHESIS
A Comparative Study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia
JANEEN BAXTER
University of Tasmania
ERIK OLIN WRIGHT
University of Wisconsin-Madison
The general-case glass ceiling hypothesis states that not only is it more difficult for women than for men to be promoted up levels of authority hierarchies within workplaces but also that the obstacles women face relative to men become greater as they move up the hierarchy. Gender-based discrimination in promotions is not simply present across levels of hierarchy but is more intense at higher levels. Empirically, this implies that the relative rates of women being promoted to higher levels compared to men should decline with the level of the hierarchy. This article explores this hypothesis with data from three countries: the United States, Australia, and Sweden. The basic conclusion is that while there is strong evidence for a general gender gap in authoritythe odds of women having authority are less than those of menthere is no evidence for systematic glass ceiling effects in the United States and only weak evidence for such effects in the other two countries.
Gender & Society, Vol. 14, No. 2,
275-294 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/089124300014002004

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. N. Cohen, M. L. Huffman, and S. Knauer
Stalled Progress?: Gender Segregation and Wage Inequality Among Managers, 1980-2000
Work and Occupations,
November 1, 2009;
36(4):
318 - 342.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Perriton
"We Don't Want Complaining Women!" A Critical Analysis of the Business Case for Diversity
Management Communication Quarterly,
November 1, 2009;
23(2):
218 - 243.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Prokos and I. Padavic
An Examination of Competing Explanations for the Pay Gap among Scientists and Engineers
Gender Society,
August 1, 2005;
19(4):
523 - 543.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. van de Vliert and G. S. van der Vegt
Women and Wages Worldwide: How the National Proportion of Working Women Brings Underpayment into the Organization
Organization Studies,
July 1, 2004;
25(6):
969 - 986.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hultin
Some Take the Glass Escalator, Some Hit the Glass Ceiling?: Career Consequences of Occupational Sex Segregation
Work and Occupations,
February 1, 2003;
30(1):
30 - 61.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. BRITTON and C. L. WILLIAMS
RESPONSE TO BAXTER AND WRIGHT
Gender Society,
December 1, 2000;
14(6):
804 - 808.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. FERREE and B. PURKAYASTHA
EQUALITY AND CUMULATIVE DISADVANTAGE: Response to Baxter and Wright
Gender Society,
December 1, 2000;
14(6):
809 - 813.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. O. WRIGHT and J. BAXTER
THE GLASS CEILING HYPOTHESIS: A Reply to Critics
Gender Society,
December 1, 2000;
14(6):
814 - 821.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|