This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by GALLAGHER, S. K. Articles by SMITH, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

SYMBOLIC TRADITIONALISM AND PRAGMATIC EGALITARIANISM

Contemporary Evangelicals, Families, and Gender

Oregon State University

CHRISTIAN SMITH

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Drawing on Connell's notion of gender projects, the authors assess the degree to which contemporary evangelical ideals of men's headship challenge, as well as reinforce, a hegemonic masculinity. Based on 265 in-depth interviews in 23 states across the country, they find that rather than espousing a traditional gender hierarchy in which women are simply subordinate to men, the majority of contemporary evangelicals hold to symbolic traditionalism and pragmatic egalitarianism. Symbolic male headship provides an ideological tool with which individual evangelicals may maintain a sense of distinctiveness from the broader culture of which they are a part. At the same time, symbolic headship blunts some of the harsher effects of living in a materially rich, but time poor, culture, by defusing an area of potential conflict, creating a safe space within which men can negotiate, and strengthening men's material and emotional ties to their families.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Avishai "Doing Religion" In a Secular World: Women in Conservative Religions and the Question of Agency Gender Society, August 1, 2008; 22(4): 409 - 433. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. H.W. Civettini and J. Glass The Impact of Religious Conservatism On Men's Work and Family Involvement Gender Society, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 172 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. K. Ammons and P. Edgell Religious Influences on Work-Family Trade-Offs Journal of Family Issues, June 1, 2007; 28(6): 794 - 826. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. H. Chong Negotiating Patriarchy: South Korean Evangelical Women and the Politics of Gender Gender Society, December 1, 2006; 20(6): 697 - 724. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. R. Thorstad, T. L. Anderson, M. E. L. Hall, M. Willingham, and L. Carruthers Breaking the Mold: A Qualitative Exploration of Mothers in Christian Academia and Their Experiences of Spousal Support Journal of Family Issues, February 1, 2006; 27(2): 229 - 251. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. K. Gallagher Where Are the Antifeminist Evangelicals?: Evangelical Identity, Subcultural Location, and Attitudes toward Feminism Gender Society, August 1, 2004; 18(4): 451 - 472. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Heath Soft-Boiled Masculinity: Renegotiating Gender and Racial Ideologies in the Promise Keepers Movement Gender Society, June 1, 2003; 17(3): 423 - 444. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. G. ELLISON and J. P. BARTKOWSKI Conservative Protestantism and the Division of Household Labor among Married Couples Journal of Family Issues, November 1, 2002; 23(8): 950 - 985. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. G. READ and J. P. BARTKOWSKI TO VEIL OR NOT TO VEIL?: A Case Study of Identity Negotiation among Muslim Women in Austin, Texas Gender Society, June 1, 2000; 14(3): 395 - 417. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. L. WARNER and B. S. STEEL CHILD REARING AS A MECHANISM FOR SOCIAL CHANGE: The Relationship of Child Gender to Parents' Commitment to Gender Equity Gender Society, August 1, 1999; 13(4): 503 - 517. [Abstract] [PDF]