Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FERREE, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by ROTH, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 12, No. 6, 626-648 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/089124398012006003

GENDER, CLASS, AND THE INTERACTION BETWEEN SOCIAL MOVEMENTS

A Strike of West Berlin Day Care Workers

MYRA MARX FERREE

University of Connecticut

SILKE ROTH

Bauhaus-University Weimar

From the perspective of gender theory, the intersections among gender, class, and race make it difficult, if not impossible, to assign political issues and identities to just one social movement. Instead, the negotiation of movement ownership of issues and identities occurs through interaction among social movements, including interactions that create denial and distance. This article takes the interaction of labor organizing and feminism as the lens for studying movement interaction at three levels: opportunity structure, organizing practices, and framing ideas. Using a case study of a strike of day care workers in West Berlin in the winter of 1989-90, it contrasts inclusive and exclusive forms of solidarity and their consequences for organizational practices. This particular strike received little support from either feminists or the labor movement and eventually failed, an outcome that can be seen as reflecting the weakness of structural and organizational supports for frames favoring inclusive solidarity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
M. Heath
Soft-Boiled Masculinity: Renegotiating Gender and Racial Ideologies in the Promise Keepers Movement
Gender Society, June 1, 2003; 17(3): 423 - 444.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
J. ADAMS
Gender and Social Movement Decline: Shantytown Women and the Prodemocracy Movement in Pinochet's Chile
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, June 1, 2002; 31(3): 285 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
L. S. WILLIAMS
Trying on Gender, Gender Regimes, and the Process of Becoming Women
Gender Society, February 1, 2002; 16(1): 29 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
R. L. EINWOHNER, J. A. HOLLANDER, and T. OLSON
ENGENDERING SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: Cultural Images and Movement Dynamics
Gender Society, October 1, 2000; 14(5): 679 - 699.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
V. TAYLOR
GENDER AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: Gender Processes in Women's Self-Help Movements
Gender Society, February 1, 1999; 13(1): 8 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]