Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCOTT, E. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 12, No. 4, 400-423 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/089124398012004003

CREATING PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHANGE

Alliances and Betrayals in the Racial Politics of Two Feminist Organizations

ELLEN K. SCOTT

Kent State University

The author examines the social construction of racial-ethnic identity and expectations for alliances based on identity in two feminist organizations. She considers the conditions in which assumed alliances work and fail, finding that race played a different role in the search for friendship and political connection among white women and among women of color. Women of color saw racial alliances as crucial in settings dominated by whites and often felt betrayed when alliances failed. White women did not speak of their connections with one another as racial alliances, nor did they express betrayal when they failed. When assumed alliances failed, women were often surprised by unanticipated cross-racial connections. Such connections provided insight to the politically constructed nature of all alliances, even those based on identities. These insights, created in and through the differences between these activists, represent the opportunity for chosen alliances, what June Jordan calls "partnerships for change."


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
S. E. Ullman and S. M. Townsend
Barriers to Working With Sexual Assault Survivors: A Qualitative Study of Rape Crisis Center Workers
Violence Against Women, April 1, 2007; 13(4): 412 - 443.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
J. Haaken and N. Yragui
Going Underground: Conflicting Perspectives on Domestic Violence Shelter Practices
Feminism Psychology, February 1, 2003; 13(1): 49 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
L. MARKOWITZ and K. W. TICE
Paradoxes of Professionalization: Parallel Dilemmas in Women's Organizations in the Americas
Gender Society, December 1, 2002; 16(6): 941 - 958.
[Abstract] [PDF]