Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRITTON, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 11, No. 6, 796-818 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/089124397011006005

GENDERED ORGANIZATIONAL LOGIC

Policy and Practice in Men's and Women's Prisons

DANA M. BRITTON

Kansas State University

This article uses Acker's theory of gendered organizations to frame an analysis of the ways in which policies and practices in a men's and a women's prison reflect and reproduce gendered inequalities. The article offers a working definition of one of Acker's key theoretical concepts, the notion of "gendered organizational logic." Then, using interview data collected from correctional officers in a men's and a women's prison, the article examines the ways in which officer training and assignments, although designed to be nominally generic, assume a male worker and disproportionately benefit male officers working in men's institutions. These findings imply that the perspective could more usefully be conceived as a theory of "masculinized" organizations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
K. Price
"Keeping The Dancers In Check": The Gendered Organization of Stripping Work in The Lion's Den
Gender Society, June 1, 2008; 22(3): 367 - 389.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
E. H. Gorman and J. A. Kmec
We (Have to) Try Harder: Gender and Required Work Effort in Britain and the United States
Gender Society, December 1, 2007; 21(6): 828 - 856.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
M. Ollilainen and T. Calasanti
Metaphors at Work: Maintaining the Salience of Gender in Self-Managing Teams
Gender Society, February 1, 2007; 21(1): 5 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
S. J. Tracy and C. Scott
Sexuality, Masculinity, and Taint Management Among Firefighters and Correctional Officers: Getting Down and Dirty With "America's Heroes" and the "Scum of Law Enforcement"
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 2006; 20(1): 6 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Men and MasculinitiesHome page
S. L. Miller, K. B. Forest, and N. C. Jurik
Diversity in Blue: Lesbian and Gay Police Officers in a Masculine Occupation
Men and Masculinities, April 1, 2003; 5(4): 355 - 385.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
D. M. BRITTON
Feminism in Criminology: Engendering the Outlaw
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, September 1, 2000; 571(1): 57 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
J. G. READ and J. P. BARTKOWSKI
TO VEIL OR NOT TO VEIL?: A Case Study of Identity Negotiation among Muslim Women in Austin, Texas
Gender Society, June 1, 2000; 14(3): 395 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
D. M. BRITTON
THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE GENDERED ORGANIZATION
Gender Society, June 1, 2000; 14(3): 418 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]