Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MANN, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by KELLEY, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 11, No. 4, 391-408 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/089124397011004002

STANDING AT THE CROSSROADS OF MODERNIST THOUGHT

Collins, Smith, and the New Feminist Epistemologies

SUSAN A. MANN

University of New Orleans

LORI R. KELLEY

Purdue University

Recent debates between modernists and postmodernists have shaken the foundations of modern social science. The epistemological assumptions of long-established procedures for constructing and validating knowledge claims have been called into question. This article discusses how two major contributors to the "new feminist epistemologies"—Dorothy Smith and Patricia Hill Collins—selectively integrate premises of modernist and postmodernist thought into their standpoint approaches. However, the particular premises they select result in significant ontological and epistemological differences between their works. These differences reflect major controversies over materialism versus idealism, as well as essentialism versus diversity. As such, these different standpoints have important implications for feminist scholarship and political practice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AffiliaHome page
A. Taylor
Substance Use and Abuse: Women's Criminal Reoffending in New Zealand
Affilia, May 1, 2008; 23(2): 167 - 178.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
J. G. READ and J. P. BARTKOWSKI
TO VEIL OR NOT TO VEIL?: A Case Study of Identity Negotiation among Muslim Women in Austin, Texas
Gender Society, June 1, 2000; 14(3): 395 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
D. Mulinari and K. Sandell
Exploring the Notion of Experience in Feminist Thought
Acta Sociologica, January 1, 1999; 42(4): 287 - 297.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
D. E. SMITH
RESPONSE TO SUSAN MANN AND LORI KELLEY
Gender Society, December 1, 1997; 11(6): 819 - 821.