Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Gender & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ARONSON, J.
Right arrow Articles by NEYSMITH, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

"YOU'RE NOT JUST IN THERE TO DO THE WORK"

Depersonalizing Policies and the Exploitation of Home Care Workers' Labor

JANE ARONSON

McMaster University

SHEILA M. NEYSMITH

University of Toronto

Community care for frail elderly people rests heavily on the work of low-status, paraprofessional home care workers. Home care workers describe their work as highly personalized caring labor that often seeps out of its formal boundaries into informal, unpaid activities. Although these activities are valued by workers, their supervisors, elderly clients, and family members, they represent uncompensated and exploited labor. Cost-cutting trends in home care management that seek to depersonalize home care labor are likely to increase its exploitative potential for paid care workers and, simultaneously, to disadvantage and jeopardize elderly home care clients and their unpaid family caregivers.

Gender & Society, Vol. 10, No. 1, 59-77 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/089124396010001005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
C. Solari
Professionals and Saints: How Immigrant Careworkers Negotiate Gender Identities at Work
Gender Society, June 1, 2006; 20(3): 301 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
S. M. Allen and D. Ciambrone
Community Care for People With Disability: Blurring Boundaries Between Formal and Informal Caregivers
Qual Health Res, February 1, 2003; 13(2): 207 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Aging HealthHome page
K. W. Piercy
When It Is More Than a Job: Close Relationships between Home Health Aides and Older Clients
J Aging Health, August 1, 2000; 12(3): 362 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied GerontologyHome page
K. W. Piercy and R. Blieszner
Balancing Family Life: How Adult Children Link Elder-Care Responsibility to Service Utilization
Journal of Applied Gerontology, December 1, 1999; 18(4): 440 - 459.
[Abstract] [PDF]