Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHAFETZ, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by DWORKIN, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 1, No. 1, 33-60 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/089124387001001003

IN THE FACE OF THREAT:

Organized Antifeminism in Comparative Perspective

JANET SALTZMAN CHAFETZ

University of Houston—University Park

ANTHONY GARY DWORKIN

University of Houston—University Park

This article develops a cross-cultural and historical theory of antifeminist movements. Such movements are composed of two elements, which often involve very different types of people: vested-interest groups and voluntary associations. Five predictions concerning the social composition of antifeminist vested-interest groups and voluntary organizations and antifeminist movement ideology are derived from the theory. Evidence taken from existing literature pertaining to both first-wave (nineteenth to mid-twentieth century) and second-wave (since 1968) antifeminist movements in a variety of nations is reviewed. Substantial support is found for all five predictions. We conclude that antifeminist movement adherents are responding to realistic threats. For men and vested-interest groups, the threat is primarily class based, but also extends to their status as family head; for women, it is primarily status based as wives and mothers, but also class-based inasmuch as their husbands' economic interests are threatened.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
K. M. BLEE
BECOMING A RACIST: Women in Contemporary Ku Klux Klan and Neo-Nazi Groups
Gender Society, December 1, 1996; 10(6): 680 - 702.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
N. KIBRIA
POWER, PATRIARCHY, AND GENDER CONFLICT IN THE VIETNAMESE IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY
Gender Society, March 1, 1990; 4(1): 9 - 24.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
B. RYAN
IDEOLOGICAL PURITY AND FEMINISM:: The U.S. Women's Movement from 1966 to 1975
Gender Society, June 1, 1989; 3(2): 239 - 257.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
D. KANDIYOTI
BARGAINING WITH PATRIARCHY
Gender Society, September 1, 1988; 2(3): 274 - 290.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
M. S. KIMMEL
MEN'S RESPONSES TO FEMINISM AT THE TURN OF THE CENTURY
Gender Society, September 1, 1987; 1(3): 261 - 283.
[Abstract]